The Sixth Guideline

Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.

Why it may be perceived negatively

For many this guideline may drum up images of the “New World Order,” the subject of numerous conspiracy theories concerning secretive power elite groups, freemasonry and the “Illuminati,” all supposedly conspiring to rule the world as a totalitarian “One World Government.” These theories are particularly prevalent among the American far-right and fundamentalist Christians, many of whom believe such events are prophesised to precede “end times” and will involve the emergence of the “Antichrist” in the form of a world leader who has made a deal with the devil in order to gain wealth and power. Considering that most of these people are eagerly anticipating the “end times” and the “second coming of Christ” which it will supposedly involve, one has to wonder why they would bother to oppose this... but of course, these are people who do not value reason.

Why the issue should not be ignored

Practically all wars could be avoided by the correct implementation of this guideline. Most wars arise due conflict between the governments of different countries over land, resources or religious or political ideologies. Whatever the cause, time and time again it is governments who declare war, and civilians (including, but not restricted to, soldiers) who lose their lives. It would be far better to resolve these conflicts in a world court, where reason rather than force would decide the outcome, ensuring that the best solution can be found. The establishment of the United Nations at the end of the Second World War was a huge step in this direction, but warfare remains commonplace around the world, suggesting severe refinement is needed.

Another situation often resulting in war is when a country’s leader becomes corrupt, oppressing his own people, and needs to be removed from power. A world court would have authority over all national leaders, ensuring they are fair to their people and conform to international standards of human rights. The world court would have the power to arrest any world leader not in compliance with these standards without the need for large-scale violent conflict.

What could be achieved?

World peace!