Balance
personal rights with social duties.
Why it may be perceived negatively
There will
always be people who are only concerned with their own interests regardless of
the consequences for others.
Why the issue should not be ignored
This
guideline reflects the Aristotelian principle of the “golden mean” whereby the
ideal virtue lies between two undesirable extremes. In this case selfishness would
be the vice of a person disproportionately concerned with their own personal
rights and neglecting their duties towards others, whilst the converse of
extreme selflessness at the expense of one’s personal wellbeing would be the
vice at the other end of the spectrum. The “golden mean” in this case is to
find the right balance between personal rights and social duty – that is, our
obligation to act in a way which benefits society as a whole.
This
principle applies to organisations as well as individuals. For instance, any
business has in addition to its primary function of generating profits, a duty to
behave ethically and contribute to economic development, while improving the
quality of life for the workforce and their families as well as the local
community and society at large. When these duties are ignored, society ceases
to function effectively and we experience severe economic and social problems.
What could be achieved?
Again, the
sky is the limit if humanity manages to sort out its priorities and work
together for the good of all.
No comments:
Post a Comment